Exposure - the most important word in photography? And I think to some extent people have made it so complex by discussing it over and over in n different ways and "compensating" in all possible ways! And a poor guy who starts with exposure is bombarded with fundas like exposure, compensation, histograms, color clipping, highlights, lowlights, exposing to the right/left, exposure correction during RAW processing etc, etc. By the time one reads through all such topics and digest something out of it, you would have forgotten shooting!
And I had already tried a bit of it while waiting for my camera. Hence once I got my camera, I never bothered about all these theories and started shooting based on live view on my LCD, compensating + or - as and when I felt it enhanced the shot to my liking.
And now when I look back, I feel that what I have done was the best possible thing as I have realized that personally for me, it is the impact of the final shot that matters, and if a shot can get the impact that I want, it should not matter whether I have underexposed or overexposed. The only criteria I now have for my pictures is whether I like it that way or not. And digital do help in this regard to shoot with different settings and then choose the best later once you start post processing...
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
You know there's no such thing as 'correct exposure'. I guess as long as it's not clipping shadows or highlights you are free to choose whatever exposure looks good to you!
Post a Comment